Obama’s Secret Meeting Exposes Ties to NWO
The secret meeting between Obama and Hillary lays bare his close connections to elite globalist power groups.
By Victor Thorn
National media outlets were abuzz the morning of June 5 with news that Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Clinton (N.Y.) had a secret rendezvous the night before, purportedly at the house of Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.). What they failed to mention was that only a few miles away, the most famous clandestine group in the world—the Bilderbergs—were also meeting in Chantilly, Virginia.
Obama’s participation in this shadowy confab with Mrs. Clinton should raise eyebrows because we’ve all been told ad nauseum that the presumptive Democratic nominee represents “change.” But is this statement necessarily true?
For starters, the Beltway mansion where he supposedly hunkered down with Mrs. Clinton is owned by Mrs. Feinstein—a member of the Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, and frequent Bilderberg attendee in the past. There is also strong evidence brought out in the latest issue of American Free Press that she has profited handsomely from the Iraq War.
But this serendipitous late-night session is only one of many links tying Obama to the New World Order. Suspicions that he was being groomed for a run at the White House became apparent in August 2007—before most Americans even knew who Obama was—when Zbigniew Brzezinski endorsed Obama for president. It should be noted that Obama hadn’t even declared that he was running for the Oval Office yet, let alone assembled any type of formal committee.
Brzezinski, of course, is a longtime globalist luminary whose mentor is none other than David Rockefeller. After reading Brzezinski’s 1970 book, Between Two Ages, which unabashedly advocates a socialist-style world government, Rockefeller recruited Brzezinski to jointly found the Trilateral Commission with him. Rockefeller then pitched this idea for ‘trilaterlism” at the 1972 meeting of the Bilderbergs in Belgium.
Another one of Brzezinski’s influential books, The Grand Chessboard, served as one of the seminal blueprints for events leading up to the 9-11 terrorist attacks, as well as America’s current debacle in Iraq. Other documents that advanced this “cause” were prof. Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations, the Project for the New American Century’s Rebuilding America’s Defenses, and Benjamin Netanyahu’s Fighting Terrorism, where he coined the term “War on Terror.”
But Brzezinski’s fixation with Eurasia goes much deeper. While acting as Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser, Brzezinski admitted many years later that he was responsible for establishing U.S. covert actions that compelled the USSR to invade Afghanistan. He stated, “The secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap . . . the day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: we now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War.”
This provocation led to bringing about the Soviet Union’s collapse, while also ending the Cold War. On the other hand, according to plan, new “enemies” were created—the Taliban, al Qaeda, and Osama bin Laden—all of whom were clandestinely funded for years by the CIA and Pakistan’s intelligence agency, ISI. Over a million men were ultimately killed during the Afghanistan war, in addition to the fact that a perfect Orwellian enemy was created when Muslims were pitted against Christians—all to Israel’s obvious benefit because the United States. would be doing their dirty work for them.
Let there be no doubt that Brzezinski was an integral architect of this “perpetual war,” for he theorized in the mid-1990s that the only way American leaders could justify a prolonged war in the Middle East was via a Pearl Harbor-style external threat. Conveniently enough, he also predicted that “Afghan terrorists” would attack the United States (i.e. the 9-11 false flag terror strikes), and that the United States would eventually target Iran for invasion. So far, his crystal ball has been eerily accurate.
Brzezinski’s meddling in genocidal wars wasn’t limited to the Middle East. He was also an ardent backer of Cambodia’s ruthless dictator, Pol Pot, whose Khmer Rouge slaughtered over two million people and buried them in mass graves. When asked about supplying direct military aid to these killers, Brzezinski acknowledged, “I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. . . . Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him, but China could.”
Considering his monstrous motives and globalist philosophy, Obama still selected Brzezinski to be his foreign policy “advisor” during his campaign. While giving a policy speech on the Iraq War in September 2007, Obama said that Brzezinski was “one of our most outstanding scholars and thinkers,” and that he was “someone I have learned an immense amount from.”
Another clue that Obama has accepted the tenets of a one-world government is his sponsorship of the “Global Poverty Act” where the United Nations would directly tax American citizens. He has also selected Susan Rice—a member of the CFR, Trilateral Commission, and Brookings Institute—to be another foreign policy adviser; while Anthony Lake is also a member of his inner circle. Lake is a notable Henry Kissinger protégé and was Bill Clinton’s former national security adviser. He was also the man who was instrumental in making policy decisions leading up to the atrocious murder of over 800,000 Rwandans—another inexcusable genocide.
Last but not least, we should all hearken back to the seminal event that placed Obama on the national stage. It occurred in 2004 at the Democratic National Convention where Obama—a recently elected unknown freshman Senator from Illinois—delivered a charismatic keynote speech which electrified the audience. Who was the man responsible for handpicking Obama; the man who literally “made” him, so to speak? It was none other than Yale Skull & Bonesman John Kerry, who ran against fellow Skull & Bonesman George W. Bush in 2004.
Is this the kind of “change” to which Obama keeps referring?