No one touched a van so I went and had the 911 call pulled to find out who exactly lied to the police.
Call Thomas Kent’s cell phone at 480-596-4726 and demand that he not make false reports to the Mesa Police Department again. Call ATS at 480-443-7000 and demand that Thomas Kent be fired.
Companies like Redflex and ATS lie to police all the time and claim someone is banging on the van. They do this because that is the only way they can get the cops to come and ask us to leave. This guy Thomas Kent lied with no regard for me and could care less if I were to be hauled off to jail for something I did not do.
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
ATS Corporate Headquarters
7681 E. Gray Road
Scottsdale, AZ 85260
Administrative Offices: 480-443-7000
Customer Service/Questions about Specific Violations: 866-790-4111
Fax: 480-607-0901
Human Resources Department: opportunities@atsol.com
Public Safety Services: safety@atsol.com
Commercial Services: commercial@atsol.com
Public Financing Services: publicfinance@atsol.com
Media Inquiries: media@atsol.com
Toll Road Services: tolls@atsol.com
PlatePass Information: sales@platepass.com
Under Arizona law, it is illegal to knowingly make a false report or statement to a law enforcement agency or a peace officer. False reporting may also occur when an individual tells a lie to a law enforcement agent, knowing he or she is misrepresenting something with the intent to interfere with the ordinary routine of the officer.
ARS §13-2907.01 False reporting to law enforcement agency
A. It is unlawful for a person to knowingly make to a false, fraudulent or unfounded report or statement or to knowingly misrepresent a fact for the purpose of interfering with the orderly operation of a law enforcement agency or misleading a peace officer.
B. Violation of this section is a class 1 misdemeanor.
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
Mesa City Prosecutor’s Office
245 West 2nd Street Mesa, AZ 85201 -
480-644-2210
7am – 6pm
480-644-5525
Police Non-Emergency
480-644-2211
City Manager Chris Brady
480-644-2066
commanager@Mesaaz.gov
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
Mayor
Scott Smith
480-644-2388
mayor.smith@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 2, 2008 to January 22, 2013
Councilmembers
District 1 – Councilmember Dave Richins
480-644-4002
councilmember.richins@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 2, 2008 to January 22, 2013
District 2 – Councilmember Alex Finter
480-644-3772
councilmember.finter@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 2, 2008 to January 22, 2013
District 3 – Councilmember Dennis Kavanaugh
480-644-3003
councilmember.kavanaugh@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 2, 2008 to January 22, 2013
District 4 – Vice Mayor Kyle Jones
480-644-3004
councilmember.jones@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 5, 2002 – 2010
District 5 – Councilmember Dina Higgins
480-644-3771
councilmember.higgins@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 2, 2008 to January 18, 2011
District 6 – Councilmember Scott Somers
480-644-4003
councilmember.somers@Mesaaz.gov
Term: June 5, 2006 – 2010
Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America – Is The ICC Next?
By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton | December 23, 2009
Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order “Amending Executive Order 12425.” It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other “International Organizations” as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.
By removing language from President Reagan’s 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates – now operates – on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
For Immediate Release December 17, 2009 Executive Order — Amending Executive Order 12425EXECUTIVE ORDER
- – - – - – -
AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL
AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO
ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES
And then comes December 17, 2009, and President Obama. The exemptions in EO 12425 were removed.
Section 2c of the United States International Organizations Immunities Act is the crucial piece.
Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable. (Emphasis added.)
Inviolable archives means INTERPOL records are beyond US citizens’ Freedom of Information Act requests and from American legal or investigative discovery (“unless such immunity be expressly waived.”)
Property and assets being immune from search and confiscation means precisely that. Wherever they may be in the United States. This could conceivably include human assets – Americans arrested on our soil by INTERPOL officers.
Context: International Criminal Court
The importance of this last crucial point cannot be understated, because this immunity and protection – and elevation above the US Constitution – afforded INTERPOL is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). INTERPOL provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice.
29. Additionally, the Court will continue to seek the cooperation of States not party to the Rome Statute and to develop its relationships with regional organizations such as the Organization of American States (OAS), the Arab League (AL), the African Union (AU), the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), ASEAN and CARICOM. We will also continue to engage with subregional and thematic organizations, such as SADC and ECOWAS, and the Commonwealth Secretariat and the OIF. This will be done through high level visits, briefings and, as appropriate, relationship agreements. Work will also be carried out with sectoral organizations such as IDLO and INTERPOL, to increase efficiency.
President George W. Bush rejected subjecting the United States to the jurisdiction of the ICC and removed the United States as a signatory. President Bill Clinton had previously signed the Rome Statute during his presidency. Two critical matters are at play. One is an overall matter of sovereignty and the concept of the primacy of American law above those of the rest of the world. But more recently a more over-riding concern principally has been the potential – if not likely – specter of subjecting our Armed Forces to a hostile international body seeking war crimes prosecutions during the execution of an unpopular war.
President Bush in fact went so far as to gain agreement from nations that they would expressly not detain or hand over to the ICC members of the United States armed forces. The fear of a symbolic ICC circus trial as a form of international political protest to American military actions in Iraq and elsewhere was real and palpable.
President Obama’s words have been carefully chosen when directly regarding the ICC. While President Bush outright rejected subjugating American armed forces to any international court as a matter of policy, President Obama said in his 2008 presidential campaign that it is merely “premature to commit” to signing America on.
However, in a Foreign Policy in Focus round-table in 2008, the host group cited his former foreign policy advisor, Samantha Power. She essentially laid down what can be viewed as now-President Obama’s roadmap to America rejoining the ICC. His principal objections are not explained as those of sovereignty, but rather of image and perception.
Obama’s former foreign policy advisor, Samantha Power, said in an early March (2008) interview with The Irish Times that many things need to happen before Obama could think about signing the Rome Treaty.
“Until we’ve closed Guantánamo, gotten out of Iraq responsibly, renounced torture and rendition, shown a different face for America, American membership of the ICC is going to make countries around the world think the ICC is a tool of American hegemony.
The detention center at Guantánamo Bay is nearing its closure and an alternate continental American site for terrorist detention has been selected in Illinois. The time line for Iraq withdrawal has been set. And President Obama has given an abundance of international speeches intended to “show a different face for America.” He has in fact been roundly criticized domestically for the routinely apologetic and critical nature of these speeches.
President Obama has not rejected the concept of ICC jurisdiction over US citizens and service members. He has avoided any direct reference to this while offering praise for the ICC for conducting its trials so far “in America’s interests.” The door thus remains wide open to the skeptical observer.
CONCLUSIONS
In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.
The pre-requisite conditions regarding the Iraq withdrawal and the Guantanamo Bay terrorist detention facility closure will continue their course. meanwhile, the next move from President Obama is likely an attempt to dissolve the agreements made between President Bush and other states preventing them from turning over American military forces to the ICC (via INTERPOL) for war crimes or any other prosecutions.
When the paths on the road map converge – Iraq withdrawal, Guantánamo closure, perceived American image improved internationally, and an empowered INTERPOL in the United States – it is probable that President Barack Obama will once again make America a signatory to the International Criminal Court. It will be a move that surrenders American sovereignty to an international body who’s INTERPOL enforcement arm has already been elevated above the Constitution and American domestic law enforcement.
For an added and disturbing wrinkle, INTERPOL’s central operations office in the United States is within our own Justice Department offices. They are American law enforcement officers working under the aegis of INTERPOL within our own Justice Department. That they now operate with full diplomatic immunity and with “inviolable archives” from within our own buildings should send red flags soaring into the clouds.
This is the disturbing context for President Obama’s quiet release of an amended Executive Order 12425. American sovereignty hangs in the balance if these actions are not prevented through public outcry and political pressure. Some Americans are paying attention, as can be seen from some of the earliest recognitions of this troubling development here, here and here. But the discussion must extend well beyond the Internet and social media.
Ultimately, a detailed verbal explanation is due the American public from the President of the United States detailing why an international law enforcement arm assisting a court we are not a signatory to has been elevated above our Constitution upon our soil.
For those of you who dont know who Michael Badnarik is get on youtube right now and search for his videos. This man is 110% pure american! His lectures are priceless and the truth/liberty/patriot movement…whatever you wanna call it, hell the world in general, cant afford to lose this man in the middle of the fight for justice and freedom!
Michael J. Badnarik, the Libertarian Party nominee for President of the United States in the 2004 elections and a former software engineer and radio talk show host has suffered a heart attack. Badnarik is also the president of the 2009 Continental Congress.
Badnarik was in Madison, Wisconsin, attending a hearing regarding a raw milk case when he collapsed, according to Gary Franchi, the National Director of Restore the Republic. After the hearing he got in a car to go to lunch with friends, He then slumped over. His friends attempted CPR and contacted the paramedics. They attempted to revive him 3 times with no success. Upon the 4th attempt his heart was revived yet with erratic behavior, writes Franchi in an email.
Michael was taken to a local hospital in Wisconsin and fitted with a temporary pacemaker and a balloon pump to ease stress on his heart. He remains in an unconscious state and his condition is listed as serious.
In November 2009, Badnarik was elected as one of three delegates from the State of Texas to attend the 2009 Continental Congress sponsored by the We The People Foundation, and subsequently elected parliamentary president of that body.
In October 2008, he began hosting a talk radio program, Lighting the Fires of Liberty, on the Genesis Communications Network.
THIS IS THE FIRST PART OF MANY IN A SERIES ON THE SUBJECT PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING.
Predictive programming, what is it? It’s a technique used to subconsciously implant thoughts or ideas into ones head over a period of time to help shape ones view of the coming world around them. The elite running this world are Fabian Socialists, which means they implement their agenda slowly through many generations. They found that through forms of entertainment such as fictional books, music and especially tv shows/movies that humans are much more susceptable to outside influences. While we are being entertained our critical thinking process shuts off and we fall into an almost hypnotic trance like state. The ideal condition for programming our minds for the coming changes the elite intend to bring throughout society. We are given this “accidental” view of history through the predictive progamming techniques. We never look back at history and think why out of all the infinite possiblities did history follow this or that path. We never ask what was it behind those events in history that caused them to happen. And that’s all by design. The elite of this world are control freaks. They have their hands in every pot on this planet. Think about this for a minute, why do we call the body of rock we live on floating through space a planet. the answer should become more evident as we go on.
As I was saying, the elite of this world are control freaks. They are deathly scared of anything outside of their grasp. They must have total control in order to keep their agenda running. They cant afford to have any “X” factors in this world. “X” factors are the unpredictables, the rebels, the ones outside the control system that threatens to disrupt all the control mechanisms that keep the masses inline and ignorant of the world around them. Any time an “X” factor pops up its either instantly subverted and taken over by the elite or squashed out of existence as quickly as possible to prevent the elite from losing control over us (the profane or useless eaters. Just 2 of the many lovely names they have for us at the bottom).
We are given this superficial view of history and the world around us and told everything is just accidental. Which couldn’t be farther from the truth. These Fabians work in long term agendas, planning things 10, 20, 50, sometimes even 100 years into the future. They are able to plan that far into the future easily because well, there’s no guess work involved in which way the world is gonna move when you are the ones that are in control of the way it moves in the first place. And that all made possible by predictive programming.
Now you still may not be sure what I mean by predictive programming. You probably want some more explanation and examples. Well, that’s not a problem.
Think about the last movie you saw or the last song you listened to. Did you think about it or analyze what is being presented to you through it or did you just sit there and just shut off your brain and just enjoy it? No need to lie, we both know that about 99.9% of the time (I’m just as guilty as you are of this) you shut off your brain and enjoyed it. Thats predictive programming. The subliminal indoctrination of the masses into a certain agenda through the use of hidden messages and symbols through various forms of communication/education/entertainment.
See Hollywood is a highly fraternal place. All the big movers and shakers there, all the big stars and celebrities we are conditioned to worship and see being superior to us, are all members of some sort of secret order, the most prominent one being Freemasonry. When you understand the purpose of these secret orders and who are members, and the things pushed by those specific people through various form of entertainment it becomes even more clear.
The name Hollywood is symbolism in itself. The wood of a Holly tree or Holly-wood is used as the staff or wand in many occult rituals/spells in these secret orders. So when you hear the phrase “movie magic” its just a esoteric (or hidden) symbolism for these secret orders and the spells (predictive programming) they cast upon the profane (you and me) through music, television and movies to guide society in certain directions and create certain elements in our culture that weren’t present before.
All the latest trends, hip bands, cool clothes, tv shows and movies, anything and everything, whatever you can think of, its all been given to us by design. There is nothing in this world that exists that hasn’t been authorized to exist. And it only exists for a purpose. These psychopaths at the top don’t just give us stuff cause they are being nice and think “hey! this would be really nice for all the slaves at the bottom”. The world doesn’t work like that. It’s all given to us for the specific purpose of subconsciously indoctrinating us into slowly accepting the idea of a New World Order or a scientifically controlled socialist-eugenics one world government.
The more you research these topics the more evident it becomes. There’s too much information to cover to write it all in this blog. It would take me many many years and many many books of writing to explain it all. What I’m presenting is just a condensed surface view of the world around us. In the next few posts on this subject (predictive programming) I’m going to be posting a bunch of videos that shows all the hidden symbolism and indoctrination into this new world order control grid through the world of entertainment and Hollywood.
Last but not least I’d like to personally thank Alan Watt (cuttingthroughthematrix.com). A lot of the information I’m presenting in this predictive programming series I learned from him. I encourage you all to please visit his website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and buy his books and send him donations and make sure you tune into his daily show. Thank you Alan for all your years of hard work and putting all the pieces together making it easier for us to understand the bigger picture.
For those of you who don’t understand what this video means, I’ll explain. The Mujahideen were the Afghanistan fighters during the 1970’s Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. We funded and trained the Mujahideen during that war and helped them defeat the Soviet Union. The Mujahideen became the Taliban and then later on they became known as Al’Qaeda. Brzezinski was the one selected to oversee this agenda. Don’t believe me? Look at the photo below for proof.
Here we have a photo of both Brzezinski and Bin Laden together in the 1970’s during Brzezinski’s training of the Mujahideen/Taliban.
It is only in the west that name Al’Qaeda is used. Why? Well as the FBI’s most wanted listing for Osama Bin Laden states: Al’Qaeda means “The Database”. Better known as the CIA list or “database” of US trained Taliban members in the middle east. Speaking of Osama Bin Laden, did you know he’s a CIA agent? It’s true. While he was in the US his cover name was Tim Osman. Look it up. I’m not kidding.
This is a video of Good Morning America where Chris Cuomo interviews 4 Pakistanis on Bin Laden and his CIA connections.
If you clicked on the link to the FBI’s Most Wanted Page for Osama Bin Laden and read his description and the list of things he is wanted for, a few questions should be raised. Like for example, why isn’t the attacks on 09-11-01 listed as one of the things he’s wanted for?
Whenever someone frets about the erosion of personal freedoms in our modern society, such as in the steady proliferation of surveillance cameras in public places, the stock answer, which is one I read all too often in my e-mail, is:
“If you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.”
People who say this are fools, not to be too blunt about it. Not only are they willing to trade away my rights, since they haven’t a basic appreciation of theirs, but their understanding of the relationship between government and the governed is one of subservience based on fear, and the idea that their fear is not only natural, but justifiably permanent given the state of the world.
Thus, we should all be fearful, all of the time. We should empower government to do whatever it feels necessary to protect us. The unquestioning nature of this logic not only institutionalizes fear, it makes it a patriotic duty. And the good citizen, the one who has done nothing wrong, will have nothing to worry about.
Oh, yeah?
Out of Britain comes the case recently of 40-year-old Jenny Paton, mother of three and, in the eyes of the state, a security hazard. Her crime? She was suspected of falsifying her address to enrol her daughter in a neighbouring school.
A covert surveillance operation was begun on her in 2008, when — and I am not making this up — an officer from the local education department followed her for three weeks. He noted her movements in a log. The department obtained her telephone records.
Paton had done nothing wrong. And the local council where Paton lives maintained it had nothing wrong, either. Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act of 2000, local governments have the power to use surveillance to investigate such picayune matters as reports of people not cleaning up after their dogs, or whose dogs bark too loudly, of people who don’t recycle or who put out their trash early, of people who operate unlicensed taxicabs. Some 474 local governments and 318 agencies have availed themselves of these powers (including, hilariously, the Charity Commission), and they can, and do, use hidden cameras, examine phone records, track website visits and hire people to go undercover.
According to a New York Times story on Paton’s case, which is being heard by a regulatory tribunal, local governments in Britain not only use these surveillance powers regularly, they “self-authorize” such activities outside the scrutiny of the judicial and law enforcement systems. One government report found that some 10,000 “directed surveillance missions” had been undertaken in a single year.
Britain, once the crucible of parliamentary democracy, is now a surveillance state, and is more insidiously Orwellian than Orwell could have ever imagined. It has an estimated 4.2 million closed-circuit TV cameras — one for every 14 citizens — and new powers allow police there to access telecom records without judicial authority. In 2007, they did so 500,000 times.
What has this all to do with us?
We are putting on an Olympics. The security budget, as best as non-government sources can estimate, is now in the range of a billion dollars. Included in that will not only be the cost of toys such as an armoured personnel carrier, but a rumoured 900 to 1,100 CCTV cameras for surveillance of Olympic venues and city entertainment areas.
There is nothing wrong with this, despite the ludicrous overkill. Security at events like these is a good thing. And the powers that be have assured the public that the CCTV cameras were temporary in nature and would all be removed once the Olympics had finished.
Well, hmmm. Colour me skeptical. Earlier this year, the City of Vancouver announced it would be retaining 10 of those cameras to be deployed on a mobile basis by police as they saw fit, and that they would be monitored out of a permanent control room at the city’s emergency operations centre.
A small matter? Numerically, yes, but cumulatively, no. Small matters add up to big trends. And what big events like the Olympics do is normalize the idea of security as an antidote to our constant state of fear. They are now as much of an Olympic legacy as debt hangover. So we spend a billion dollars to counteract every possible attack, including domestic, foreign or yet to be imagined, and get ever used to the idea that we must let governments do whatever they must — including trampling on our right to privacy — to protect us.
Sociologist David Lyons of Queen’s University has a good line on this. He said surveillance efforts are no longer being based on “insurable risks” — where risk was assessed on historical precedent — but have shifted to “incalculable risks” — those unimaginable acts of terrorism like 9-11 that government maintains can be countered only by increased security and surveillance.
In that sense, to allude to that hoary Bush-ism, the terrorists have won.
We not only fear the terrorists, but our governments, too.
Really…Bernanke? The man who helped drive this country into an even deeper economic disaster by spending our hard earned tax dollars in massive bailouts to banks and financial institutions that should HAVE FAILED and disappeared into the annals of history, where they rightly deserve to go. I guess we’ve all forgotten about the massive secrecy behind the amount of money that was really spent to keep these “too big to fail” corrupt fat cats going. We were told it was only gonna be 700 billion dollars, no biggie right? Its not like we the working people of this country, who wont make in a life time what they make in a year in just bonuses, need that money… No that’s just crazy talk. But when the actual numbers finally came out the total cost of the bailouts was in the TRILLIONS of dollars and guess what… we STILL DON’T KNOW where most of that money went. Has everyone forgotten about all the lies that were spouted day and night to scare us all into submission and all the threats made to congressmen/senators about what would happen if they didn’t act now? Have we forgotten about how all the people that were bailed out, err….banks that were bailed out are all the same banks that most of this current administration WORKED FOR or had unnervingly CLOSE TIES to prior to being put into political office? No, no, it would seem America’s forgotten all about that already.
We just move from crisis to crisis. And with every new crisis that comes our way we always seem to forget about the crisis that came before it. How many of you remember the Swine Flu scare back in the mid 1970’s? Do you remember what a scam that was? It would seem history repeats itself, as always. Though I guess I shouldn’t take to seriously who TIME magazine names person of the year. They never name anyone person of the year who actually does any good. I mean after all THEY DID NAME HITLER MAN OF THE YEAR back in the 1930’s.
GMO cornfields in Canada. A new European study “clearly reveals … new side effects linked with GM maize consumption” affected the liver and kidneys, but also other organs for three Monsanto GMO corn varieties. (Photo: DawnOne)
A study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences demonstrates the toxicity of three genetically modified corn varieties from the American seed company Monsanto, the Committee for Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (Criigen, based in Caen), which participated in that study, announced Friday, December 11.
“For the first time in the world, we’ve proven that GMO are neither sufficiently healthy nor proper to be commercialized. [...] Each time, for all three GMOs, the kidneys and liver, which are the main organs that react to a chemical food poisoning, had problems,” indicated Gilles-Eric Séralini, an expert member of the Commission for Biotechnology Reevaluation, created by the EU in 2008.
Caen and Rouen University researchers, as well as Criigen researchers, based their analyses on the data supplied by Monsanto to health authorities to obtain the green light for commercialization, but they draw different conclusions after new statistical calculations. According to Professor Séralini, the health authorities based themselves on a reading of the conclusions Monsanto has presented and not on conclusions drawn from the totality of the data. The researchers were able to obtain complete documentation following a legal decision.
“Monsanto’s tests, effected over 90 days, are obviously not of sufficient duration to be able to say whether chronic illnesses are caused. That’s why we ask for tests over a period of at least two years,” explained one researcher. Consequently, the scientists demand a “firm prohibition” on the importation and cultivation of these GMOs.
These three GMOs (MON810, MON863 and NK603) “are approved for human and animal consumption in the EU and especially the United States,” notes Professor Séralini. “MON810 is the only one of the three grown in certain EU countries (especially Spain); the others are imported,” he adds. A meeting of EU ministers over MON810 and NK603 is scheduled Monday.
